The end of Libor: the biggest banking challenge you’ve never heard of

Tue, 2019-10-08 20:53

LONDON: On June 30, British bank NatWest sent out an
arcane-sounding press release — bus operator National Express had
become the first company to take out a loan based on Sonia, a
replacement for scandal-hit interest rate benchmark Libor.
It was billed as the first switch of thousands that British firms
would make by end-2021, when the benchmark is set to be
Four months on, NatWest’s trailblazing Sonia switch has been
followed by only one other loan, when the bank struck a deal with
utility South West Water on Oct. 2.
The slow progress highlights the challenge banks and borrowers face
as regulators attempt to end the use of Libor, a benchmark embedded
in as much as $340 trillion financial contracts worldwide from home
loans to complicated derivatives.
Libor, once dubbed the world’s most important number, was
discredited after the 2008 financial crisis when authorities in the
United States and Britain found traders had manipulated it to make
a profit.
But replacing Libor is proving expensive and tricky with concerns
that, if mishandled, it could trigger credit market confusion and
waves of lawsuits, finance industry sources said.
With no obvious alternative, some countries are adopting their own
benchmarks. The United States is leading the way with a booming
trade in derivatives linked to its new Sofr rate, while the
European Central Bank started publishing Estr, its new interest
rate benchmark, earlier this month.
In Britain, professional investors such as hedge funds and pension
insurance clients are also already writing and trading derivatives
contracts linked to Sonia. But companies which make up the
so-called Libor “cash” market of sterling-denominated loans are
dragging their feet or are even not aware of the shift.
At least two banks in Britain have shifted staff from teams
preparing for Brexit to specialist Libor taskforces in the past
quarter as the issue becomes more pressing, industry sources
“Part of the market is very educated and smart on this and part
of the market is not even aware that Libor is going,” said Phil
Lloyd, head of market structure & regulatory customer
engagement at NatWest Markets.
Lloyd said banks like NatWest are battling to allay concerns among
corporate borrowers that the Sonia benchmark will make it harder
for them to know how much interest they owe because the rate is
backward looking.
Sonia, the sterling overnight index average, is based on the
average of interest rates banks pay to borrow sterling from one
another outside market hours, and is published at 9:00 a.m. local
time (0800 GMT) daily, after the transactions have been vetted by
the Bank of England.
Borrowers taking out Sonia loans will in effect not know exactly
how much interest they owe until they are required to pay.
In contrast, loans linked to Libor can have forward-looking term
rates, meaning borrowers have greater certainty over their future
liabilities and can manage cash flows more easily.
Bankers and consultants said the market was exploring a
forward-looking Sonia term rate by mid-2020 to appease borrowers
but not everyone is in favor.
The overnight Sonia rate, based on actual transactions, is seen as
more robust and less vulnerable to the kind of manipulation that
affected Libor, which was based on rates submitted by banks.
The Libor rigging scandal saw billions of dollars in fines levied
on major banks and jail sentences for traders convicted of
manipulating the benchmark for profit.
Some banks and lawyers fear the creation of a Sonia term rate,
which would likely be based on forward-looking estimates from banks
as opposed to past transactions, could undermine the security of
the benchmark and even spawn legal dangers for banks.
Murray Longton, a consultant at Capco who advises financial firms
on Libor transition, said banks were fearful of lawsuits, as the
proliferation of alternative Sonia term rates offered by different
lenders could spark allegations of mis-selling.
“If you get this wrong, this is PPI for investment banking- if
you haven’t communicated properly and you move a customer (on to
Sonia) and benefit, there could be a case where this gets reviewed
and you owe your client a lot,” he said.
The Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) mis-selling scandal in
Britain has cost banks more than 43 billion pounds in compensation
after the contracts were retrospectively deemed to have been
“A lot of the corporate market are waiting for a few things of
which one is a term rate. And if they never get a term rate, then
waiting will lead to them still executing Libor, and not being
ready for Sonia. The clock is ticking,” Lloyd said.
“And the other point about having a term rate is you’re
starting to get back into a world where you are really recreating a
new version of Libor.”
But the reluctance of corporate borrowers to buy into Sonia is not
the only reason for the slow progress.
Banks face large costs for adapting systems and educating thousands
of relationship managers on the merits of Sonia over Libor.
Fourteen of the world’s top banks expect to spend more than $1.2
billion on the Libor transition, data from Oliver Wyman show, with
the costs for the finance industry as a whole set to be several
multiples of that sum.
Much of this cost is linked to the arduous task of changing the
terms of contracts tied to Libor whose duration extend beyond the
2021 deadline. Progress has been held up not only by nervous
borrowers but also by banks in loan syndicates which may not always
agree on the new wording required to adapt existing loan agreements
to the new benchmark.
“You need unanimous agreement to change the baseline product, so
what are the chances if you’ve got 10-15 participants (in a
syndicate) that they will all agree on the same thing?,”
Capco’s Longton said.
Some corporate borrowers are also playing a wait-and-see game to
see whether they can benefit financially from Libor’s slow death
spiral. But this could have costly consequences, depending on the
so-called “fallback” language in contracts for their existing
These fallbacks — originally designed to kick in if Libor was
temporarily unavailable — usually stipulate alternative rates,
such as calling other banks for a quote or using the last published
Libor rate. But the fallback clauses were not designed to cope with
Libor ceasing to exist indefinitely.
That could create big risks for borrowers, for example, by
potentially converting a “floating rate” loan, tied to the
fluctuations of Libor into a fixed-rate one.
Serge Gwynne, a partner at consultant Oliver Wyman, said regulators
could do more to help banks manage the transition away from Libor,
starting with much harder deadlines on when it would formally cease
to exist.
“Libor is embedded everywhere in the plumbing of the financial
world, that’s why this is such a big challenge,” said
“You are changing a product that has been used to create markets
for a long time. You are not just taking one thing out and putting
one thing in but changing the whole dynamic of how this

Main category: 

UK watchdog tells banks to show plans for ending Libor useSocGen
reaches deals to end probes on Libor, Libya
Source: FS – All-News-Economy
The end of Libor: the biggest banking challenge you’ve never heard of