Wall Street is seeing an adoption surge for complex forms of AI. But firms still need to wrap their heads around the tech — and explain it to regulators.

Geoffrey Horrell, Refinitiv

Summary List Placement

Financial firms are putting more resources towards using complex forms of machine learning. And that means they’ll also need to develop ways to better understand the tech and explain it both internally and to regulators. 

A recent survey by data giant Refinitiv on the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services found that 75% of respondents were using some form of deep learning, a type of ML that includes a series of complex, ever-evolving calculations.  Those surveyed included data scientists, quants, and executives at a variety of financial firms. 

Geoffrey Horrell, head of Refinitiv Labs in London, told Business Insider that the surge of interest in deep learning means firms will need to invest resources in understanding these complex algorithms.

Deep-learning techniques can be used to handle more complex problems thanks to their ability to ingest and understand significant amounts of data. However, that additional firepower comes at a cost.

“As you see that growth in deep learning, and particularly around the text analysis part of deep learning, there’s that need to have better explainability,” Horrell said. 

Wall Street’s AI leaders are already considering explainability

The increased focus on being able to explain and interpret machine-learning techniques stems from the top, Horrell said. Leaders in the field have already set up governance teams for their AI models and are filling roles focused on ensuring the tech is used appropriately and fairly, he added.

For all the benefits the use of artificial intelligence offers— streamlining manual processes and faster analysis of data — the tech still has its hangups. AI models have been found to be racially biased, often times because of the datasets they ingest

As a result, the industry has been hesitant about where to deploy the tech, especially when it pertains to decisions directly impacting customers. 

In May, Business Insider reported that Bank of America hired Diane Daley, a former Citigroup executive, to lead its enterprise governance function. Daley’s responsibilities include AI policies, standards, and oversight. 

Read more: Big Wall Street banks are quietly forming a group to explore the hidden risks in AI, and it shows how much the finance industry still has to learn about the technology

Cathy Bessant, the bank’s chief operations and technology officer, has long been outspoken about the responsible use of AI. Bank of America was a founding donor of Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government’s Council on the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in 2018

In August 2019, Business Insider reported some of the largest Wall Street banks, including Morgan Stanley and Citi, were in the process of forming a working group. 

“There is a lot of interest and activity in this whole area,” Horrell said. “The people who are leading are talking about this, and I think things may follow rapidly.”

Regulators also want firms to show their work when it comes to AI

The increased use of machine learning has also caught regulators’ eyes, Horrell said. In particular, rule makers are keen to understand how the technology would be applied to making decisions that directly impact customers. 

Things like credit decisions, know-your-customer processes, and anti-money laundering tools all fall into that category. 

In short, anytime a choice is being made about whether a service will be given to someone, regulators want to understand how the firm reached that conclusion, Horrell said. 

And while regulators have yet to put forth specific rules around how they want firms to monitor AI usage, considerations are already being made. The European Union currently preparing its first set of rules around AI. 

“The idea that regulation might come, again, means that people will want to get interested in this,” he said. 

To be sure, it’s not just regulators that are motivating firms. The companies themselves are eager to understand how these technologies reach different decisions. 

While the use of AI for investment research or trading ideas might not catch the eye of regulators, it is important for firms to understand how those techniques will work under different market conditions. 

Horrell said investors want to make sure AI-based models are robust enough to withstand various market conditions, as opposed to doing just enough data-mining to find some correlations that might not stand the test of time. 

See also: ‘I’d rather turn them into robo cops’: Execs from Man Group, Bridgewater, and Schonfeld explain how they’re trying to blend humans and machines

The rise of quantamental strategies — the use of quantitative and fundamental techniques — has further increased those efforts. 

As traditional funds look to incorporate more quantitative modelling into their process, it’s important for them to understand how the tech works, Joshua Pantony, CEO of Boosted.ai., a fintech that helps fundamental managers use quantitative skills.

“Explainable machine learning that can tell you what it’s doing has probably been the single most important success factor we’ve seen in clients trying to take the quantamental approach,” he said. 

SEE ALSO: The CIO of ServiceNow says that employees will never embrace AI unless the underlying algorithms are ‘explainable’ and understandable to humans

SEE ALSO: The chief data officer at $6 billion hedge fund Balyasny explains how to merge quantitative and fundamental trading strategies — and the importance of ‘translators’ to bridge the gap

SEE ALSO: ‘Quantamental’ investing is suddenly a buzzword in the hedge fund world, and we talked to the CEO of a fintech that just nabbed $8 million to help power the approach

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why Pikes Peak is the most dangerous racetrack in America

Source: businessinsider
Wall Street is seeing an adoption surge for complex forms of AI. But firms still need to wrap their heads around the tech — and explain it to regulators.